What makes Kreya a good Insomnia alternative
The first version of Insomnia was released in 2016. It was later acquired by Kong. The simplicity of Insomnia heavily inspired the UI of Kreya. Here is why Kreya is a good Insomnia alternative and why you should consider switching from Insomnia to Kreya.
Kreya vs Insomnia comparison: What are the differences?
Overview
Feature / topic | Insomnia | Kreya |
---|---|---|
Usage without account | (❌) | ✅ |
Reusing authentication | (❌) | ✅ |
Directory settings | ❌ | ✅ |
Sharing projects | Only with paid plan | Free |
Storing data locally | (❌) | ✅ |
Free plan | ✅ | ✅ |
Pricing (Individual) | $5 user/month | $5 user/month |
Pricing (Enterprise) | $45 user/month | $10 user/month |
Required accounts and dark patterns
An account is required to use most of the Insomnia features. Only the Scratch Pad can be used without logging in. Insomnia also has a history of using dark patterns. For example, the 8.0 update of Insomnia uploaded all user data into the cloud without consent from the user. Users were unable to access their Insomnia data until they created an account. This also created a security leak, since sensible information stored in Insomnia projects were suddenly uploaded to the cloud.
In contrast, using Kreya does not require an account (unless using a paid version). All data is stored completely locally in JSON format, allowing for easy storage and backup in git (or any other syncing software).
Limited gRPC support
Using the Insomnia gRPC feature, it is sometimes obvious that adding support for gRPC was an afterthought. Kreya supports a lot of gRPC features that Insomnia lacks, such as server reflection, ability to refresh protobuf definitions, environments, templating and more.
Authentication
Kreya supports several authentication mechanisms such as OAuth2 or Windows authentication, which Insomnia also supports. Reusing the same authentication configuration in Kreya is easy, as there is no need to duplicate authentication information for different requests. Comparing this with Insomnia, it is much more of a hassle to reuse the same authentication configuration for multiple requests, as the authentication parameters must be copied each time.
Directory settings
A feature that makes Kreya a joy to use are the directory settings. It allows users to specify default settings for multiple operations in a folder or the whole project. For example, if all operations in a project use the same endpoint or the same authentication configuration, it only needs to be specified once. This even supports templating and environment specific values, so switching between environments works flawlessly after the initial configuration. Insomnia does not have a comparable feature.
Data storage and sharing
Insomnia stores the data in a single database file in the appdata directory. Sharing Insomnia projects continuously with other users requires a paid plan. Storing a Insomnia project in a VCS (eg. alongside the actual API code) is not easy, as it would require constant manual exports and imports. In contrast, Kreya explicitly stores the data in a format that is easy to sync with for example git. Case in point is that Kreya does not store stringified JSON (which could cause a lot of merge conflicts) and allows users to choose where the data is stored. Users can choose the software responsible for syncing themselves and are not locked into using Kreya.